All stories
The front page and the section pages show what is current. This page lists everything we have published, so a story stays findable after it stops being news.
Policy
We read both Directions to Comply on the eSafety register. Each targets a high impact generative AI DIS with a tier 1 risk profile, each cites the same two compliance measures, and each is about age assurance on AI-generated pornography.
Policy
Schedule 6 of the Age-Restricted Material codes has bound designated internet services since 9 March 2026. It names AI companion chatbots, deems some generative services highest-risk without an assessment, and creates a regulated category for platforms that host uploaded models.
Policy
The Online Safety (Designated Internet Services) Industry Standard 2024 defines a 'high impact generative AI DIS' and binds it: prevent prohibited outputs, test models, differentiate AI outputs, and assess before a material change. Registered June 2024, in force 22 December 2024.
Policy
The Relevant Electronic Services industry standard, covering messaging and email, was determined by the same Commissioner on the same day as the standard that regulates generative AI. It does not use the word generative once. What it does say about AI, and what that means.
Policy
On 25 May 2026 Australia and the UK signed a memorandum of understanding on AI safety and security. The department published a three-bullet overview, not the instrument. Eleven weeks earlier it published the Canada MoU in full, so we know what these agreements usually contain and what the overview leaves out.
Policy
The ACITI Partnership was announced in November 2025 with an emphasis on green energy innovation, resilient supply chains and critical minerals, and AI as something it would also examine. The memorandum of understanding signed on 10 July 2026 sets up four working streams, all of them AI, and does not mention minerals, energy or net zero at all.
Policy
The Australia-Canada memorandum of understanding on AI safety is published in full. It creates no legally binding obligations, has no financial implication for either country, and can be ended on six months' notice. It also sets two hard deadlines, and the second one falls around 1 September 2026.
Policy
Australia's AI Safety Institute was announced on 25 November 2025 and sits inside the department it advises. Its technical partners include the Australian Signals Directorate. The multi-agent risk project cited as its work was published four months before it existed and funded by the department. And the international network it belongs to has dropped the words AI Safety from its name.
Policy
On 20 July 2026 six ministers jointly named the Albanese Government's AI safety priorities: a Digital Duty of Care, a second tranche of privacy reform, workplace AI safety, consumer law options, and a framework for automated decision-making in federal agencies. Each has a different lead minister and a different legal instrument. None carries a published date.
Policy
The OAIC has updated its guidance on facial recognition in retail spaces to implement the Administrative Review Tribunal's findings in the Bunnings matter, which covered 62 stores between 2018 and 2021. The Privacy Commissioner says a precautionary approach is required and that each deployment must still be assessed individually. The Kmart determination remains under review with hearings in early 2027.
Research
The OAIC's triennial Australian Community Attitudes to Privacy Survey put AI companies equal-last on trust at 4 per cent. Ninety-six per cent want conditions before AI makes a decision about them, and every condition measured in both years rose. We read the 2026 report and set it against the policy Australia actually chose.
Data
The National AI Centre and CSIRO's census of Australia's AI ecosystem counts 1,533 companies, 25 urban clusters led by Melbourne CBD, patents nearly quadrupling, and a commercialisation gap of almost 23 publications per patent. The numbers, charted from the report.
Regulation
ASIC Commissioner Simone Constant's 8 May 2026 open letter tells every AFS licensee that frontier AI is accelerating cyber attacks now, lists twelve expected actions, and anchors the lot to the FIIG Securities judgment. What a board must be able to show.
Data
DEWR's new monitoring report is the first Australian government data on AI and employment: exposed occupations grew 5.6 per cent against 9.5 per cent for the least exposed, the effect is not robust, software jobs are up 25 per cent, and the most exposed workers are majority women and degree-holders.
Safety
OpenAI's system card rates all three GPT-5.6 models High capability for cybersecurity and biological risk. Washington reportedly held the launch for testing. In Australia the same models arrived under no AI-specific check, which is the government's explicit design.
Policy
In September 2024 the government proposed ten mandatory guardrails for high-risk AI and three ways to legislate them, including an Australian AI Act. The National AI Plan commits to none of them, and the word guardrails does not appear once in its 37 pages.
Government
The NSW Auditor-General's 2025 internal controls report found 21 of the state's 26 largest agencies using 357 AI tools, while only 38 per cent have a formal AI policy and 5 per cent have AI procurement guidance. The numbers, from the audit itself.
Business
OpenAI's own documentation lists Australia as a data residency region with storage yes, processing no: prompts are still processed on offshore infrastructure, and residency endpoints carry a 10 per cent price uplift for new models. What that means before you tick the compliance box.
Industry
WiseTech Global's 1H26 ASX release announces a phased headcount reduction of up to 50 per cent in product, development and customer service, about 2,000 roles, framed as becoming an AI-led organisation. What the filing actually says, and the caveats it carries.
